Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility
Abstract Objectives: To present the current state of the art in various robot- assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale,CA, USA).
Materials and methods: The search strategy in this review was conducted in accor- dance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search strategy was conducted in MED- LINE, PubMed and the Cochrane electronic databases (from 2000 to present) to identify studies that included both robotic and male infertility.
Results: In all, 23 studies were found, 12 of which met our inclusion criteria. Arti- cles were excluded if the study did not include both male infertility and robotics.
Conclusions: Robotic assistance for microsurgical procedures in male infertility appears to be safe and feasible. It has several advantages including elimination of tremor, multi-view magnification, additional instrument arms, and enhanced dexter- ity with articulating instrument arms. It also has a short learning curve with a small
Introduction
In 1970s, the operative microscope was introduced into male infertility procedures. Since then, several developments have occurred in assisted reproductive technology (ART) [1,2]. The technology in infertility procedures has evolved substantially since the incorpo-ration of the da Vinci® robotic platform (IntuitiveSurgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) into microsurgi- cal procedures [3].The da Vinci surgical system is currently the only commercially available USA Food and Drug Adminis- tration (FDA) approved robotic platform. Today all types of microsurgical procedures for male infertility can be performed using this robotic platform [3]. The latest version of the da Vinci robot features a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) view (with up-to × 10–15 magnification) and three robotic instru- ment arms. These instruments are capable of sixdegrees-of-freedom, thus mimicking the surgeon’s hand, wrist and finger movements with 180° articula- tion and 540° rotation. It enhances the ability of the surgeon to rotate instruments to a wider range than the human hand and provides a new capability in microsurgery. The robotic instrument arms also elimi- nate physiological tremors and provide motion scal- ing. The surgeon console provides a comfortable, ergonomic interphase to minimise surgeon fatigue. Having an extra third robotic instrument arm also allows the surgeon to control one additional instru- ment and be less reliant on the surgical bedside assis- tant. This extra arm can also hold adjunctive imaging or sensing tools, e.g. a Doppler ultrasonography (US) probe and provide additional real-time inputs to aid the surgeon [4].Abbou et al. [5] first reported the use of robot- assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 2000 to help alleviate some of the surgeon fatigue and technical limitation issues of laparoscopy.
As robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures became more widespread, the potential for using this platform for robot-assisted microsurgery was also explored in animal studies [6–8]. These studies were then followed by early human trials [9–11]. Further exploration of the use of this platform in larger studies is ongoing [12]. The present article reviews the latest literature in robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertil- ity: microsurgical vasectomy reversal, microsurgical sub- inguinal varicocelectomy, and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE).