摘要：当前是一个价值多元化的社会，人们的个体意识不断增强，许多人追求个人利益至上，常常出现个别人滥用诉权、虚假诉讼，面对这些情况，我国形成了由案外人执行异议之诉、第三人撤销之诉、案外人申请再审组成的案外人权益救济制度体系。本文着重比较分析案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉，来阐释二者都属于事后救济程序，都以救济案外第三人的正当权益为立法本意，都有冲击民事裁判既判力的功能等方面的联系以及针对的对象，提出的主体，起诉的条件，提出的期间，管辖法院以及是否中止执行原生效法律文书等方面的区别，来明晰二者的缺点和优势，以为案外人在权益受到侵害，陷入制度选择困难时，提供明确的参考角度和选择标准，进而避免权利遭受损害，更好的维护自己的合法权益。

关键词：案外人；第三人撤销之诉；案外人执行异议之诉

An Analysis of the Actions by Outsiders to Dispute the Objections and the Claims by the Third Party to Revoke

Abstract：At present, there is a multi-valued society. People’s inpidual consciousness is constantly on the rise. Many people pursue personal interests first, and inpidual inpiduals often abuse their rights of action and false lawsuits. In response to these situations, China has formed a case for the enforcement of objections by outsiders. The system of remedy for the rights of outsiders constituted by the revocation of the tribunal and the application for retrial by the trio. This article focuses on comparative analysis of the case against the outsider and the third party to revoke the case to explain that the two are ex post facto remedies. All of them use the legitimate rights and interests of the third party outside the case as the legislative intent, and all have the function of impacting the civil judgment. The aspects of the contact and the targeted object, the subject of the proposal, the conditions for the prosecution, the period of submission, the jurisdiction of the court, and whether the suspension of the implementation of the original legal document in effect, etc., to clarify the disadvantages and advantages of the two, that the outsider in the rights and interests When infringement is caught in difficulties in choosing a system, it provides a clear reference point and selection criteria, thereby avoiding the damage to the rights and better safeguarding their own legitimate rights and interests.

Key words: outsider;  third party's revocation;  outsider's enforcement of objection

目录

摘要 I

Abstract II

目录 III

一 引言 1

二 案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的概述 1

（一）案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的概念 1

（二）案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的立法进程 2

三 案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉异同分析 3

（一）案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的联系 3

（二）案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的区别 4

四 案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的优势与不足 6

（一）案外人执行异议之诉的优势与不足 6

（二）第三人撤销之诉的优势与不足 6

五 案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的竞合及对案外第三人选择救济程序的建议 7

（一）案外人执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉的竞合 7

（二）对案外第三人选择救济程序的建议 7

参考文献 9

一 引言

在民事诉讼中，往往并不仅仅采用某一种救济方式来实现全方位保障当事人的诉讼救济权利的目的，而是采用多元化的救济渠道，以期切实保障诉讼权利。依全球视角而言，很多国家都以多种救济方式并存的形态，构建权利救济体系，打造多元救济层次，以供当事人选择，为保护当事人的诉讼权利提供全面保障。